Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| PermissionConstants.KNOWLEDGE_PROBLEM_CREATE.get_workspace_permission_workspace_manage_role(), | ||
| RoleConstants.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.get_workspace_role(), | ||
| ViewPermission([RoleConstants.USER.get_workspace_role()], | ||
| [PermissionConstants.KNOWLEDGE.get_workspace_knowledge_permission()], CompareConstants.AND), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code provided has minor syntax issues that can be addressed:
- In the
ViewPermissionfunction, there is an error with the comparison operator. It should useCompareConstants.ORinstead ofCompareConstants.AND. Ensure proper case sensitivity when using constants likeCompareConstants.
Here's the corrected line:
ViewPermission([RoleConstants.USER.get_workspace_role()],
[PermissionConstants.KNOWLEDGE.get_workspace_knowledge_permission()], CompareConstants.OR),Additionally, consider simplifying the logic for user permissions and roles to avoid unnecessary conditions. This might require rethinking how permission validation works within the system.
Overall, these changes will help ensure that the code runs without syntax errors and potentially improves its readability and maintainability.
2 participants
fix: Problem create permission